nuclearcat wrotetmash2 wroteI'm pretty sure that anyone reading your responses would be flabbergasted. I am also sure now that rules are not applied to everyone here, especially rule #3. You twisted many words as well.
---
but for whom does it matter, besides nerds who spend half their lives playing dota and other shooters?
since you have your funny 4Mbit congested
Highlighted in bold is factually incorrect or blunt lie.
otherwise you dishonor yourself with illiterate statements.
When you say that this is just "caching unencrypted traffic", you are putting your geek reputation on the line.
What your claims you based on? Tactile sensations, or did you do some more or less technical research on traffic sources and speeds?
Enough said. I would delete these if I had a bit of respect for myself. I responded lately to these to let people see how dishonest your company is and not fall in the same trap. You also changed one of my quotes regarding the CDN! Are you going after every customer slightly criticizing your company and calling them liars and demanding qualifications before posting a feedback?
QoS rules applies to all users.
Anybody at TH with decent physical connection (VDSL or GPON) can test by himself, put several downloads and watch title that is cached on local Netflix CDN node. You wont experience any buffering, because of QoS, this is one of easiest examples.
Where did i changed anything you said about CDN? This is your own words:
YouTube and Netflix weren't offloaded either, only certain titles from Steam and few non encrypted sources (HTTP/FTP), not really a CDN, more like caching.
And this is total bullshit and lie.
Because both are offloaded to local CDN nodes.
And i repeat, as i said before, you either deliberately lied or are not qualified to discuss on this topic (CDN and caching). I think it is second.
There is multiple methods to verify that, from checking traffic by sniffer while watching youtube/netflix, to checking hostnames owned by netflix/google resolving to THGV ips. These methods are known by anyone who has minimal knowledge of networking.
P.S. Yes i screwed up on hundreds of terabytes on 300Mbps and it shameful for me. You can get only theoretical maximum 94.8TB. Sucks that i skipped to do math before making statement.
See, you diverted the subject again although the original argument was over ADSL.
Read that quote again, never said there is no CDN, I only said they don't ->SEEM<- offloaded, not really like a CDN, immediatly called me a liar, then you said my line is crap, even though it did 19MBit on unencrypted sources, which at first you called me illiterate for mentioning this, later you said that you do offer unencrypted proxy! And for the million time I only reported my feedback, never accused, do you know what that means? This is what I and only I got from your service.
What's with the terabyte thing, the P.S, I was never going after this topic, and yes you have mistaken your calculations even though you mocked me with "alarming news" and me faking the numbers before you actually read your stats, not to mention it was theoretically impossible at ADSL (which you said everyone uses cable anyways which is flabbergasting) that's the only reason why I responded to that, I even respectfully speculated and replied that it may have been a typo or the summation! even then that is offtopic and one of the many, I don't understand why. Why do you think I'm shaming you for this? That's a toxic act.
Please read your tone from the beginning of your first reply, I know people are going through rough times with their businesses, but this is not a good way to maintain a good reputation, worse is that you mentioned that you're a freelancer for this company which is more confusing.
"And i repeat, as i said before, you either deliberately lied or are not qualified to discuss on this topic (CDN and caching). I think it is second." Why would I do that? What's with the hositility? Why would I lie? Actually you called me a liar on your first reply as well. You said that on your very first reply as well. And how is this allowed on this forum? The topic wasn't even CDN or caching, all I said that your implication that the CDN gives you a speed boost didn't happen to
me, and old reports (beginning of this thread) reported the same. Again for million times never debated whether you do implement CDN, caching, or whatever. Worse is that later you said you don't know what the CDN really covers.
Tell me what a CDN is and what your ISP covers, this is a geek forum, and tell me why downloading a file from HTTP source the second time jumps from 4mbit to 19mbit, and why Netflix like you mentioned (you designed) is stuck at 4Mbit. And why did you even mention CDNs in the beginning of this thread and it's benefits in which we are not getting, and how is that a good thing. If it doesn't provide speed boost or cute quota, then why mention it? That's ISP level disucssion at the point, not end user, who cares, stop calling it a benefit. I don't care if Ogero delivers 4mbit Netflix to my house from whatever vs THGV deliveirng 4mbit Netflix from whatever CDN (if I could with FUP)...
I will not reply anymore, enough with the drama.
