3G cannot be cheap... it is better than GSM 2.75G, but still spectrum/bandwith not so efficient.
Those journalists, who wrote article about 21Mpbs and that cedarcom give 0.256Mbps... well, they dont know, that this 21Mbps is spherical horse in vacuum. It is possible only if noone is talking/working on base, and customer sit right under base... and even like that, customer equipment cannot get 21Mbps, it is whole base/sector capacity.
Add that this capacity for 21Mbps will cost for taxpayers 100-150K USD, and Cedarcom base cost much less.
Plus frequency high, means you need MORE bases to cover Lebanon. Base is VERY expensive, as i mention. Lebanon is extremely difficult country in this matter because of mountains. Even on obsolete GSM they cannot make proper coverage, what to to talk about 3G. My IMHO 3G should be implemented by private companies, with proper government regulation. Or even jump directly to LTE, it is more promissing.
Last thing. Who think 3G can replace other ISP's...
http://www.businessinsider.com/which-att-3g-plan-should-you-buy-2010-6
"Additional packs of 1 GB will be available for $10."
Do you think if AT&T sell like those price in USA, it will be cheaper in Lebanon? :-)
3G is EXPENSIVE technology.