LebGeeks

313

Member

Re: Feedback for Ogero

Thank you Bro   *Worked Flawless*

DNA

Member

Re: Feedback for Ogero

Finally!

anyone subscribed to above 8mbps package from ogero ?
any isp that offers unlimited service above 2mbps?

ManOwaRR

Member

Re: Feedback for Ogero

SNR Margin (dB)    28.7    27.4

why mine very low comparing to yours :/

xterm

Moderator

Re: Feedback for Ogero

GUYS how did you got the PPPoE username and password ?

I called Ogero and asked them for it.

Kazouza

Member

Re: Feedback for Ogero

SNR Margin (dB)    28.7    27.4

why mine very low comparing to yours :/

Note the 0.1dB .. his SNR margin is  24.3 and 28.6

DG

Member

Re: Feedback for Ogero

If you visit Ogero's web page you will see they are offering a free modem to new subscribers (offer valid until 31/01/2017).
That's a first.

mickzster

Member

Re: Feedback for Ogero

Is anyone having issues with their Ogero DSLs?
Internet for the past 3 days has been absolute shit, I keep losing connection and even when there is connection, it's slow as hell..
I can't even watch a 144p video on YouTube while usually I do at 480p without pausing.

DG

Member

Re: Feedback for Ogero

Which DSL modem do you have ? Check the 4th light if it's a Thomson modem when this happens. Does it go off ?

I am assuming your connection is slow because it's re-syncing (after disconnecting) at a very low speed due to a low SNR.

You need to check your modem parameters when this happens. Type 192.168.1.254 in the browser and enter the following username/password:  user / user

user

Member

Re: Feedback for Ogero

Read'em and weep guys http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/5914212774
ping to Europe is between 68 and 80 ms, not as good as I had imagined given that that is fiber optics and costs the company around 800$ a month)

jibbo

Member

Re: Feedback for Ogero

Read'em and weep guys http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/5914212774
ping to Europe is between 68 and 80 ms, not as good as I had imagined given that that is fiber optics and costs the company around 800$ a month)

it says ping 2ms

user

Member

Re: Feedback for Ogero

That is a test against a speedtest server in Lebanon, but pinging a server our company owns or one that I own in Europe is 68 to 80 ms (depending on the server location) a speedtest against a server in Europe gave me a 40 ms whereas to east US gave me 140ms.

nuclearcat

Member

Re: Feedback for Ogero

Does this company have QoS? Is measurements done on channel with utilization below 80%?

Because fiber from ogero, _real one_, looks like this (server in germany):
nuclear@nuclear-desktop:~$ ping germany.<removed for privacy>
PING germany.<removed for privacy> (a.b.c.d) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from <removed for privacy> (a.b.c.d): icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=98.5 ms
64 bytes from <removed for privacy> (a.b.c.d): icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=98.5 ms
64 bytes from <removed for privacy> (a.b.c.d): icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=98.4 ms
64 bytes from <removed for privacy> (a.b.c.d): icmp_seq=4 ttl=51 time=98.9 ms
64 bytes from <removed for privacy> (a.b.c.d): icmp_seq=5 ttl=51 time=98.4 ms
64 bytes from <removed for privacy> (a.b.c.d): icmp_seq=6 ttl=51 time=98.2 ms
64 bytes from <removed for privacy> (a.b.c.d): icmp_seq=7 ttl=51 time=98.3 ms
64 bytes from <removed for privacy> (a.b.c.d): icmp_seq=8 ttl=51 time=98.3 ms
64 bytes from <removed for privacy> (a.b.c.d): icmp_seq=9 ttl=51 time=98.3 ms
64 bytes from <removed for privacy> (a.b.c.d): icmp_seq=10 ttl=51 time=98.3 ms
64 bytes from <removed for privacy> (a.b.c.d): icmp_seq=11 ttl=51 time=98.5 ms
64 bytes from <removed for privacy> (a.b.c.d): icmp_seq=12 ttl=51 time=98.4 ms
64 bytes from <removed for privacy> (a.b.c.d): icmp_seq=13 ttl=51 time=98.5 ms
64 bytes from <removed for privacy> (a.b.c.d): icmp_seq=14 ttl=51 time=98.4 ms
64 bytes from <removed for privacy> (a.b.c.d): icmp_seq=15 ttl=51 time=98.3 ms
64 bytes from <removed for privacy> (a.b.c.d): icmp_seq=16 ttl=51 time=98.6 ms
64 bytes from <removed for privacy> (a.b.c.d): icmp_seq=17 ttl=51 time=98.5 ms
64 bytes from <removed for privacy> (a.b.c.d): icmp_seq=18 ttl=51 time=98.5 ms
64 bytes from <removed for privacy> (a.b.c.d): icmp_seq=19 ttl=51 time=98.3 ms
^C
--- germany.<removed for privacy> ping statistics ---
19 packets transmitted, 19 received, 0% packet loss, time 18026ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 98.283/98.479/98.926/0.408 ms

user

Member

Re: Feedback for Ogero

Our underlying infrastructure is very vague as it is not controlled directly by us, but by a centralized administration in Beirut Digital District. We were told we are on fiber optics from ogero, speedtest latency results were as I mentionned previously and everything was very fast. So I have no reason to doubt what they told us. I have absolutely no clue what the usage is on it at the time of my testing(though I seemed to have gotten better results than you have?)  curiously though, pinging a server in the netherlands yielded worse results than pinging a server in ireland, which I found weird, I did not try germany.

haidcar

Member

Re: Feedback for Ogero

@user can you please do speed test on Orange's Server in Marseille, France

user

Member

Re: Feedback for Ogero

Not sure, they put us on this fiber because our main subscription ran into problems, when they fix it they will move us back to the cheap one(not sure when) and my car broke down and I won't be at work until I fix it. I'll let you know.

eido

Member

Re: Feedback for Ogero

anyone facing packet loss with ogero?

DG

Member

Re: Feedback for Ogero

Seems fine here.

aboulfouf

Member

Re: Feedback for Ogero

Does Ogero have an option for online gaming, because COD is NAT: strict most of the times when i play on the PS4?

Doom

Member

Re: Feedback for Ogero

Does Ogero have an option for online gaming, because COD is NAT: strict most of the times when i play on the PS4?

You can turn off interleaving for lower ping.

Silentcontrol

Member

Re: Feedback for Ogero

i think you should forward some ports on your router google them you'll find i had the same issue with rainbow six siege i googled which port to forward did it and it went from strict to open

aboulfouf

Member

Re: Feedback for Ogero

Does Ogero have an option for online gaming, because COD is NAT: strict most of the times when i play on the PS4?

You can turn off interleaving for lower ping.

How do you turn off interleaving?

Doom

Member

Re: Feedback for Ogero

Does Ogero have an option for online gaming, because COD is NAT: strict most of the times when i play on the PS4?

You can turn off interleaving for lower ping.

How do you turn off interleaving?

Try what Silentcontrol said, I didn't know what NAT was.
Anyways,if you really want to turn off interleaving,check first your router statistics,if theres few FEC errors/hour,then contact Nader rifai,check his email from prevous posts in this thread.If you have too many FEC errors,turning off interleaving might cause internet disconnections.

Good luck.

Edit: Sorry, FEC not HEC.

Last edited by Doom (January 3 2017)

Silentcontrol

Member

Re: Feedback for Ogero

agreed but interleaving will not fix nat type

roudy5

Member

Re: Feedback for Ogero

Guys can i turn interleaving off safely ? i don't know what is as high number of errors and what's not..
FEC Errors (Up/Down):    7 / 131.174
CRC Errors (Up/Down):    7 / 1
HEC Errors (Up/Down):    5.397 / 1

user

Member

Re: Feedback for Ogero

@user can you please do speed test on Orange's Server in Marseille, France

Orange as in orange.fr?
I just did and the result is 52 ms

Pinging orange.fr [193.252.133.34] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 193.252.133.34: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=242
Reply from 193.252.133.34: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=242
Reply from 193.252.133.34: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=242
Reply from 193.252.133.34: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=242
Reply from 193.252.133.34: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=242
Reply from 193.252.133.34: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=242
Reply from 193.252.133.34: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=242
Reply from 193.252.133.34: bytes=32 time=53ms TTL=242
Reply from 193.252.133.34: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=242
Reply from 193.252.133.34: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=242
Reply from 193.252.133.34: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=242
Reply from 193.252.133.34: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=242

like not even budging from 52 ms.

And speedtest.net http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/5932629223 still 52ms
Wow I am surprised they are that consistent.

Last edited by user (January 3 2017)