Xsever wroteMy cap here in Canada is 60GB per month. Had the company advertised that package as "unlimited", you'd take them to court since it's false advertisement.
I am not against setting a cap since we need to maintain a positive rate of change, but PLEASE do not advertise it as "unlimited" ! Just set a cap, and mention it in the terms before signing the contract! Hal2ad bedda?
I was appointed as a 2nd technical expert on a such court trial (6 years ago). Here in Bulgaria the bandwidth is really cheap.
But, a customer's account has been canceled by an ISP, they just have waited for the current month to finish and refused to renew
his contract. Since at that time there was no other ISP in the building, the customer opened a court trial against the ISP.
Under first impression I was self-convinced to plead the ISP guilty (of course it is not only my opinion, the other 2 experts were to
give their as well).
But what turned out was:
The user used to keep his PC on 24 hours per day !!! For God sake... he was using the connection after work regularly. When he goes to sleep or is at work, his PC is queued with heavy downloads (the ISP is not allowed to monitor the traffic). According to the words of this user he was
just queing random content - mp3, movies, software, e-books and just reviewing quickly.... whatever he finds useful - he burns on a DVD, whatever does not - just delete. The whole reason for this was that the user recently had acquired a DVD writer...
The attorney of the ISP (and then the judge) agreed that a "home user account" means:
* no more than one PC connected to the same link inside the house
* habits of a regular person profiled - u come after work, use the connection like for 4 hours, not more. Imagine, you come from work at 18:30,
shou.... just sitting on the PC till midnight? No shower, no dinner, no TV, no some other stuff?
* Of course, not every night.... a regular person sometimes goes on a vacation, or goes out in the downtown.
* Not more than 50% average usage.... come on, not all of you just download movies at maximum during their work. You just chat, check mail, browse
So obviously this person's Internet habits could not fit under the profile of a regular "home user". That's why the ISP was found to be
non-guilty and the user had to pay the trial charges.
AND I FULLY AGREE ON THIS
As you see, Battikh, not all the things can be strictly profiled as XXX GB, XXX hours... If you do, many regular users will suffer because
of several abusers.