Tech Guru wroteAvoK95 wroteThere is absolutely no reason to buy an Intel CPU in 2021.NuclearVision wrotethank you!
I was considering the ryzen you suggested, I've been reeding online how amd are turning the tables now.
But in my younger years, I remember amd processors having issues in pcs and laptops alike with random issues.
I am no expert, but i feel like intel is more trustworthy.
The 2600X has a higher IPC (Instructions Per Clockcycle - Can do more per GHz), and twice as many threads as the 9400F).
The only dominance Intel had was in the gaming section, which has been dominated recently by the new 5000 Series AMD CPUs.
Even Apple started making its own chips.
As for laptops, AMD laptops are cheaper, faster, run cooler, and have better battery life.
Don't be bias on CPU brands. If you go pick up a calculator, it doesn't matter if it's a Texas Instrument or a Casio, they both do the same calculations correctly.
Furthermore, you will not be focusing on gaming anyway, so buying the CPU that is better overall is much better, therefore I would go with the AMD option.
Regarding the Gigabyte board, the H310 is the cheapest chipset available for that 9th gen CPU, this is not necessarily a bad thing, you have to check the options you need and don't need compared to other chipsets and then decide on finer features between manufacturers and their product line using one of those chipsets.
https://i.imgur.com/VXXHvxU.png
Not at all
I9 10900k ~ 540 USD
R9 5950x ~ 800 USD
I9 10900k ~ 14nm refined based on aging 2015 Skylake Architecture
R9 5950x ~ Refined 2nd Gen 7nm
I9 10900K ~ Headroom to OC
R9 5950X ~ Limited Headroom to OC
Yet AMD "fanboys" want to foam very hard as if intel is gone with the wind.
Apple to Apple (Without OC)
Hardwareunbox
Techpowerup
On Par , faster or got beaten doesnot mean dethroned Intel .. Intel is dethroned when their is a wide disparity. 7nm + vs 14nm++++ with a "similar performnace" is a pure shame for AMD.
https://i.ibb.co/gjJmp9Y/20201105-174939.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/p208CpP/20201105-174957.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/44tgLRP/20201105-175018.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/gZ9vNj3/20201105-175049.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/y5LHDqL/20201105-175108.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/qxQn602/20201105-175123.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/j6CrtmP/20201105-175201.jpg
No one is talking about those components here and your comparison is invalid and also irrelevant to the topic at hand.
You are just plain wrong.
You also completely copy-pasted the exact same post you previously made and have proven wrong multiple times in multiple ways, please go seek your thirst for attention elsewhere and avoid adding confusion to an already complicated topic
The 9400F is a 6 Core 6 Thread CPU that only exists to compete with Ryzen chips in the gaming segment for a cheaper price.NuclearVision wroteI am more confused than ever.
I can go i5-9400f for 150$.
i5-9600 for 250$ (needs cooler)
Found Ryzen 5 3600 for 230ish.
I think the 9400 may be underwhelming at 2.9ghz compaed to 3.6 ghz of the other 2.
I watched youtube videos, game seem to consume 20% less cpu power on the ryzen (it stays cooler too) compared to the i5 which have pretty similar performance (justifies notnspending 100$ more for 9600 although it has a builtin gpu).
I am reluctant to go with intel, as I read more, I have the impression that the 3600 will not be obsolete soon, these i5 are already from the past, I don't know the reasoning behind this, perhaps games will need more threads in the near future? Why does the ryzen have an edge in this category.
I am not building this to play ultra graphics games, I don't have the luxury of time to have such entertainment.
But since I am spending money anyway, I'd rather have something that stays 'uptodate' for the longest possible.
thanks guys, you are great friends.
The Ryzen 5 2600X and 3600 feature 6 Cores 12 Threads.
As I have mentioned before, Intel chips were better at gaming until Zen 3 came out.
But even older Zen 2 and Zen+ CPUs (being the 3600 and 2600X) are better CPUs overall that are much more capable.
It just makes no sense to go Intel in 2021.