The i9 exists to compete with the Ryzen 7 since the Ryzen 5 was competing with the i7.
The Ryzen 9 exists just to be a league of its own, a budget Threadripper if you will.
No one here is being a fanboy the numbers are posted on all reputable websites who do non-bias reviews and all of them conclude and agree to the dominance of AMD CPUs.
Intel is known to be struggling with their Instructions Per Clock. (How many instructions per GHz)
They perform better in games due to faster clock speeds and the way they boost.
The benchmarks you posted are all gaming benchmarks that show the i5 and i9 performance difference is minuscule (Especially when you go even higher resolution where the CPU will matter less.) You did not even mention where you got these numbers for. Please post your references.
Thanks to the way Zen3 works, they obliterated Intel.
14nm vs 7nm simply means the die is smaller, it doesn't necessarily make it faster. (Even though in the case of AMD it
is faster. The IPC of AMD is much higher, you can look up benchmarks on things other than gaming.
Also, your post does not show any 5600X benchmarks in the charts, the 5600X in some cases is performing much better.
The 5600X, a 6 core processor is beating the 10 Core i9 in gaming at almost all games.
The i9 is beating Ryzen 5 in only 1 or 2 games by 2 or 3 FPS, which you can spend the hundreds of dollars you saved buying the 5600X to get a better GPU and get higher FPS regardless, so the i9, in this case, is made irrelevant. Also again, pay attention to clock speeds.
I'm gonna post some credible websites below for people to check the numbers in gaming, rendering, compression, and whatever they like:
-
AnandTech
-
Guru3D
- TechJesus himself on Youtube at GamersNexus:
-
Ryzen 5 5600X
-
Ryzen 7 5800X
-
Ryzen 9 5900X
-
Ryzen 9 5950X
Some reviewers are claiming that the only reason they're even putting Intel in their benchmarks is so that people don't forget that Intel exists in the market because AMD is mostly competing with its own older-gen CPUs at this point.
anayman_k7 wrote
funnily enough the real shame are those pluses after the 14nm, and the next Intel CPU is going to increase the pluses again, Intel can't even innovate anymore, they are failing to deliver 10nm since years, they fail to support a motherboard chipset/socket for more than 1 generation and they keep increasing the power limits to be able to compete.
Precisely
