- Edited
When an 3950X @750USD Lags Behind the I9 9900k @ 500 USD Released a Year Earlier & with 14nm , AMD fans will say the 3950X is not a gaming cpu , a productivity one with look at the CPU utilizations thing when they say min fps lagging. Forgetting the Old FX days ( High cores # with luclaster per core performance behind the scenes) .
Old Song & Dance .. Again & Again ..
Here Come AMD PreRelease Hype Train Slides that made many foaming hard.
PS:
I own an I9900k + Maximus Z390 Extreme XI + ... and a friend gifted me an R9 3900x + X570 Aorus Xtreme ... Test by your self then drop the hype train.
Some Insight:
I9 9900k: October 2018
3950x: November 2019
I9 9900k: 14nm++++
3950x : 7nm
I9 9900k: 500 USD
3950x : 750 USD
Difference: 250 USD
I9 9900k : 5Ghz (Boost) 1st Two Cores , No IPC Increase
3950x : 4.7 Ghz (Boost) 1st Core , 25% IPC Increase
When AMD fails , AMD users will always say: it has another purpose
Each AMD release get many foaming and perceive Intel get doomed . Why do all the AMD fans feel the need to prove themselves? Just get over it already AMD fans. Stop trying to justify your purchase.














Old Song & Dance .. Again & Again ..
Here Come AMD PreRelease Hype Train Slides that made many foaming hard.
PS:
I own an I9900k + Maximus Z390 Extreme XI + ... and a friend gifted me an R9 3900x + X570 Aorus Xtreme ... Test by your self then drop the hype train.
Some Insight:
I9 9900k: October 2018
3950x: November 2019
I9 9900k: 14nm++++
3950x : 7nm
I9 9900k: 500 USD
3950x : 750 USD
Difference: 250 USD
I9 9900k : 5Ghz (Boost) 1st Two Cores , No IPC Increase
3950x : 4.7 Ghz (Boost) 1st Core , 25% IPC Increase
When AMD fails , AMD users will always say: it has another purpose
Each AMD release get many foaming and perceive Intel get doomed . Why do all the AMD fans feel the need to prove themselves? Just get over it already AMD fans. Stop trying to justify your purchase.













