You are not logged in.
I think you guys should wait at-least 2 weeks, or till August to notice any difference(that being said in the news n' all)
http://www.speedtest.net/result/1375820632.png
@Ogero 512
BTW, look at my ISP, it says "Reliance Globalcom Limited"!! Have you ever heard about it ?
Doesnt supposed to be "LibanTelecom" ?!
I actually reboot by modem if I get anything other than Libantelecom. Another one I have gotten is Beyond the Network america and it makes you think you are in London. If we had good speeds, we could conceivably use the ibbc player and watch UK shows.
Edit, as it happens to be, I have to reboot my modem. Look at the distance I am from city in the UK and how I slower than other users in the UK (surprising not as bad as one would think)
Last edited by xazbrat (July 8 2011)
10:55 am
IMEWE Connection
C:\Users\*****>ping bbc.co.uk
Pinging bbc.co.uk [212.58.241.131] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 212.58.241.131: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=241
Reply from 212.58.241.131: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=241
Reply from 212.58.241.131: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=241
Reply from 212.58.241.131: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=241
Ping statistics for 212.58.241.131:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 72ms, Maximum = 75ms, Average = 73ms
Last edited by TheStunMan (July 8 2011)
Little improvement noticed here, but not a big deal
Terranet DSL 256 kbps, Bekaa
Last edited by SolidPain (July 8 2011)
EVERYONE's ON! ALL ISPs and OGERO are now ONLINE on the IMEWE! :) (tested and confirmed) MABROUK!
Umm... i dont know what to say...testing time.
On pingtest.net, my IP has changed.
Does that relate to the note Samer Karam has posted?
EDIT: I'm with Ogero
Last edited by Mahmoud Brk (July 8 2011)
I dont think that ISP will start assigning users to IPs on IMEWE until next month.
VISP will make their new packages next week
I definitely think there is improvement in pings. I play DOTA daily on Garena. Last week, pings ranged between 250ms and 650ms. Now pings range between 95ms and 200ms. Green pings all the way!
No improvements here yet, cyberia 512Kbps ADSL
Samer Karam posted this, can anyone confirm, I am on IDM and cannot ping so can anyone ping 4.69.143.238 and post the results :
PING ae-7-7.ebr1.Paris1.Level3.net (4.69.143.238): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 4.69.143.238: icmp_seq=0 ttl=59 time=90.340 ms
C:\Users\****>PING ae-7-7.ebr1.Paris1.Level3.net
Pinging ae-7-7.ebr1.Paris1.Level3.net [4.69.143.238] with 32 bytes
Reply from 4.69.143.238: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.69.143.238: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.69.143.238: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.69.143.238: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=55
Ping statistics for 4.69.143.238:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 66ms, Maximum = 67ms, Average = 66ms
C:\Users\Mhmd>ping ae-7-7.ebr1.Paris1.Level3.net
Pinging ae-7-7.ebr1.Paris1.Level3.net [4.69.143.238] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 4.69.143.238: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=56
Reply from 4.69.143.238: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=56
Reply from 4.69.143.238: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=56
Reply from 4.69.143.238: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=56
Ping statistics for 4.69.143.238:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 86ms, Maximum = 88ms, Average = 87ms
Last edited by Mhmd (July 8 2011)
C:\*****>PING ae-7-7.ebr1.Paris1.Level3.net
Pinging ae-7-7.ebr1.Paris1.Level3.net [4.69.143.238] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 4.69.143.238: bytes=32 time=102ms TTL=59
Reply from 4.69.143.238: bytes=32 time=102ms TTL=59
Reply from 4.69.143.238: bytes=32 time=101ms TTL=59
Reply from 4.69.143.238: bytes=32 time=104ms TTL=59
Ping statistics for 4.69.143.238:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 101ms, Maximum = 104ms, Average = 102ms
What's so special about this IP?
C:\*****>PING ae-7-7.ebr1.Paris1.Level3.net Pinging ae-7-7.ebr1.Paris1.Level3.net [4.69.143.238] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 4.69.143.238: bytes=32 time=102ms TTL=59 Reply from 4.69.143.238: bytes=32 time=102ms TTL=59 Reply from 4.69.143.238: bytes=32 time=101ms TTL=59 Reply from 4.69.143.238: bytes=32 time=104ms TTL=59 Ping statistics for 4.69.143.238: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 101ms, Maximum = 104ms, Average = 102ms
What's so special about this IP?
It's related to the IMEWE
@ 11:17 PM
This is the highest speed I got, and during this time I usually get 0.2~ 0.3 down at best!
Last edited by SolidPain (July 8 2011)
It's related to the IMEWE
And how shall we know if we're benefiting from the IMEWE by just pinging this IP?
We should know the before-the-IMEWE-get-turned-on ping so we can make a comparison, and thus check if there's any improvements or not.
Last edited by Mahmoud Brk (July 8 2011)
again, I would like to say the reason that many of you are still getting high pings(or "normal" pings) is most probably because IMEWE is on, but ISPs probably hasn't put it into effect for customers until there is a new pricing list approved, so again guys, take it easy on the results, wait a week, or 2(or until 1st August) and I bet something nice will happen lol
according to this, Leb should start experiencing the effects of IMEWE in less than 2 weeks
http://www.elnashra.com/news/show/36515 … 8%AC%D9%84
who knows, maybe one day we can get this lol
(obviously not in Leb ;) )
I'm not in Leb but here's my ping results on that IP you guys are talking about:
Pinging ae-7-7.ebr1.Paris.Level3.net [4.69.143.238] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 4.69.143.238: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=54
Reply from 4.69.143.238: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=54
Reply from 4.69.143.238: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=54
Reply from 4.69.143.238: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=54
Reply from 4.69.143.238: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=54
Reply from 4.69.143.238: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=54
Reply from 4.69.143.238: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=54
Reply from 4.69.143.238: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=54
Reply from 4.69.143.238: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=54
Reply from 4.69.143.238: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=54
Reply from 4.69.143.238: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=54
Ping statistics for 4.69.143.238:
Packets: Sent = 11, Received = 11, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 44ms, Maximum = 45ms, Average = 44ms
I don't get it, if it's supposed to benefit you guys how come I'm getting the lower pings on it? or is it just that I'm pinging a server in Paris?
Last edited by Raficoo (July 8 2011)
Reply from mpt.gov.lb is ~ 50ms
Reply from bbc.co.uk is ~ 100ms
Logic says that haven't we got that hight latency to a 'server' just miles away, Latency to Europe should have been ~60ms at max... It is not about the IMEWE from now on but our internal infrastructure...or am I mistaken? Could it get better if the latency to a server just few miles away stays 50ms ?