LebGeeks
You are not logged in.
- Topics: Active • Unanswered
#376 July 6 2020
- Talm
- Member
Re: Feedback for TerraNet
Talm wrote:I've had terrible experiences with them, plus they use bursts to trick dumb speed testers like ookla's.
Latency isn't consistent, when I called them, they told me that my subscription is for home use not gaming lounge...Oh, wow that sounds pretty bad, where are you located if I may ask?
Assuming you're under their ADSL service can you please ping 185.60.114.159 and 8.8.8.8 and tell me what results you get?
Thanks.
Sorry I left them 3 months ago.
#377 July 6 2020
- stereotype
- Member
Re: Feedback for TerraNet
stereotype wrote:Talm wrote:I've had terrible experiences with them, plus they use bursts to trick dumb speed testers like ookla's.
Latency isn't consistent, when I called them, they told me that my subscription is for home use not gaming lounge...Oh, wow that sounds pretty bad, where are you located if I may ask?
Assuming you're under their ADSL service can you please ping 185.60.114.159 and 8.8.8.8 and tell me what results you get?
Thanks.Sorry I left them 3 months ago.
Did you go with Ogero?
#378 July 6 2020
- Talm
- Member
Re: Feedback for TerraNet
Talm wrote:stereotype wrote:Oh, wow that sounds pretty bad, where are you located if I may ask?
Assuming you're under their ADSL service can you please ping 185.60.114.159 and 8.8.8.8 and tell me what results you get?
Thanks.Sorry I left them 3 months ago.
Did you go with Ogero?
Yeah and I'm pretty happy, plus IPv6 hops are way less than IPv4, even Google search results are snappier.
#379 July 6 2020
- stereotype
- Member
Re: Feedback for TerraNet
stereotype wrote:Talm wrote:Sorry I left them 3 months ago.
Did you go with Ogero?
Yeah and I'm pretty happy, plus IPv6 hops are way less than IPv4, even Google search results are snappier.
What are your results when you ping 185.60.114.159 and 8.8.8.8?
#380 July 6 2020
- Talm
- Member
Re: Feedback for TerraNet
Talm wrote:stereotype wrote:Did you go with Ogero?
Yeah and I'm pretty happy, plus IPv6 hops are way less than IPv4, even Google search results are snappier.
What are your results when you ping 185.60.114.159 and 8.8.8.8?
First is unpingable
Second:
PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: seq=0 ttl=254 time=45.253 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: seq=1 ttl=254 time=45.206 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: seq=2 ttl=254 time=45.351 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: seq=3 ttl=254 time=45.454 ms
--- 8.8.8.8 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 45.206/45.316/45.454 ms
Interleaving off
#381 July 6 2020
- stereotype
- Member
Re: Feedback for TerraNet
stereotype wrote:Talm wrote:Yeah and I'm pretty happy, plus IPv6 hops are way less than IPv4, even Google search results are snappier.
What are your results when you ping 185.60.114.159 and 8.8.8.8?
First is unpingable
Second:
PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: seq=0 ttl=254 time=45.253 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: seq=1 ttl=254 time=45.206 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: seq=2 ttl=254 time=45.351 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: seq=3 ttl=254 time=45.454 ms--- 8.8.8.8 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 45.206/45.316/45.454 msInterleaving off
Weird 185.60.114.159 is definitely pingable maybe try again if you get the chance.
Your 8.8.8.8 ping stats are literally half my stat results, since I get around 80-90 ms on a good day lol, can't wait to switch over.
#382 3 days ago
- boudz
- Member
Re: Feedback for TerraNet
anyone can help me to choose the best setting ?
i have terranet 6mb unlimited
Last edited by boudz (3 days ago)