- Edited
Thank you. Yes the numbering is simple and convenient.
I have a concern though, that logrotate would swich out history.log between two commands, in which case the number will then be referring to something else.
If this happens, the fresh history.log would probably be an empty file, which would limit the potential for damage.
I have a concern though, that logrotate would swich out history.log between two commands, in which case the number will then be referring to something else.
If this happens, the fresh history.log would probably be an empty file, which would limit the potential for damage.