Hamzawesome

MasterBatata wroteDMZ will open all ports on the router only to the specified device such as your psvita. This will solve your NAT problem if the router has some closed ports that the psvita uses, but if the ports are closed on the ISP level then you have to ask your ISP to open them.

https://support.us.playstation.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/3825
http://portforward.com/english/routers/port_forwarding/

The first contains the ports for PSN and the second site contains tutorials on how to open ports for many routers.
These helped me to change my NAT type from 3 to 2, but did not improve much the connection because my ISP refused to open ports.

I'll try. Thank you so much for your help. :)

MasterBatata wrotei have the same problem from NAT types and NAT types of 3 and 2 get problems due to blocked ports from your ISP or router.
You can try to DMZ the PSvita on the router or if you don t have this feature try port forwarding PSN ports.

What is DMZ? How to forward PSN Ports?

I have a PS Vita. I've owned one for about a year and a half.

My problem is that I can't play online. Games like Killzone: Mercenary, Dragon Ball Z: Battle of Z (Demo), and Terraria never work with me. I can search for rooms, but after that I always get a message saying that it's been disconnected.

My PSN account is UAE (Emirates).

My results (according to http://www.speedtest.net) show that my 'Ping' is 135 ms (I believe that Ping is latency) and Download Speed is 0.90 Mbps (The speed might increase depending on the time of the day.)

Help would be appreciated. :)

Note: The results of speedtest.net are the average, I've done more Speed Tests and they all were slightly different from what I've got first.

rolf wroteHey, update: I bought two USB controller which look exactly like the PS2 controllers yesterday. They cost me 20 000 both at Compuworld.
The quality is not the same than the original Sony ones, far from that, but they work - I tested them :)
DNA, thanks for your offer, I'll be interested when I have a PS3.

I have one of those too. But be careful, they won't even last for a year, be VERY careful with those controllers, if you drop it on the floor it's goodbye.

Thankfully, my cousin gave me his PC controller after mine was dead, his controller literally lasted for YEARS. It's maybe because he never used it...

Nino Store said that at his Facebook page:

"PS4 500GB + 1 month PSN Plus 800$.
Best deal is PS4 + 2 Games of your choice + 2 DualShock 4's 1000$."

The funny thing is that he's saying "Best Deal". This is seriously BS.
He also said that it's price is gonna drop after a month, but I doubt that it's price will be below 700$. -_-

Saw the video. It looks okay to be completely honest. The graphics look great, but the gameplay is meh. (even though we only saw 5 seconds of it)

Ugh...I hate how they raise the prices like that. What's next? One PS4 game costs 200$? I think I'll pass on PS4 for the next 5 years.

Hmm...it looks good, but will it sell?

They'll release a PC version probably next year. Heck, the development for the game took more than 1/4 a Billion dollars, so releasing it on 2 platforms is enough. When they make money from the game when it comes out, they'll release a PC version.

I used GTA instead of Grand Theft Auto since it's a known game, even among casual gamers. Anyways, I suggest you try out Terraria, it's available for PC, PS3, 360, iOS, ans soon Vita and Android. It has Minecraft, RPG, and shooting elements.

maulader wrote

Hamzawesome wrotePlay Sonic Generations or Minecraft. Get a rest from the shooters, guys. There's better games to play...

Not my type's of games if u bothered to read the first post. Also if you did read it you would see that I only mentioned one shooter game that actually had more RPG elements in it then actually being a shooter.

I did read the first post, but didn't understand anything cause you're using abbreviations instead of full titles. How am I supposed to know what GW2 is?

And why aren't those 2 your type of games? What's wrong with platformers? What's wrong with sandbox games? You play GTA the entire time, then why not try Minecraft?

I'm not trying to say that the shooters are bad, I'm just suggesting for you to TRY those games. Spend some time into them, don't judge a game by it looks.

Play Sonic Generations or Minecraft. Get a rest from the shooters, guys. There's better games to play...

I'm late, but do any other discs work?

I'm currently playing Final Fantasy 7. Mega Man 1, 2, and 3, Mega Man X3, The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time, The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past, and Age of Empires 1 and 2.

So...no one played Final Fantasy 7? I'm playing it right now on my Vita. Just finished Cosmo Canyon~

Chafic wrote

Hamzawesome wrote

Chafic wroteThe Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time was another epic game in my childhood. I loved that game.

They used to sell N64's in Lebanon?

I wasn't in Lebanon I was in London when I bought it.

That makes sense. Cause all I got when I was 1-4 years old was an NES...
Then a GBA
Then a PS2
Then a PSP
then a Vita.

Chafic wroteThe Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time was another epic game in my childhood. I loved that game.

They used to sell N64's in Lebanon?

rahmu wrote

... and 70+ hours of gameplay.

You obviously haven't gone through defeating Emerald and Ruby weapons. Especially Ruby. That son of a bitch...

Honestly, I'm only 15 hours into the game.

I saw this from the reviews for FF7 I read.

Those 2 games defined the 6th generation of gaming, both were released around the same time in 1997 and 1998.

The Legend of Zelda: OoT was released in 23rd of November in 1998 for the Nintendo 64, and I think Nintendo has done an amazing job taking the elements of The Legend of Zelda: A Link To the Past, and shifting it to 3D.

Final Fantasy VII (or 7) was released in 7th of September in 1997 for the Sony PlayStation, an Amazing RPG, lovable characters, phenomenal plot, deep customization, and 70+ hours of gameplay.

I know that OoT was released a year after FF7, but that doesn't stop us from comparing them, right? Also the games are from 2 different genres, OoT is an Action-Adventure game, while FF7 is an RPG as I stated earlier.

Personally, it's really and I mean REALLY hard for me to choose between the 2 games. I like the plot and customization of FF7, but OoT has some kind of charm making it stand up in a lot of ways.

OoT is full 3D, while FF7 takes a Sonic 3D Blast-like camera while you're not in battle.

If you haven't played any of them yet, Final Fantasy 7 is available in PSN Store as a PSone classic for PS3, PSP, and PS Vita also it's available on steam, and Ocarina of Time is available in the Wii's Virtual Console, or you can get Ocarina of Time 3D which is a remaster of the original for the Nintendo 3DS and it's the definitive version of OoT, if you have a 3DS then it's a must-buy.

Which do you prefer? Share your thoughts!