Xserver wroteWe never hear about it being a health risk as much as a garbage dump is for example.
I beg to differ, several lawsuits have been issued against state electricity companies (I only heard of those in the states) who built their high voltage towers near residences, playgrounds, and schools seeing that long term exposure to EMF can induce leukemia for children. Alot of debate has been triggered as to whether they do or don't induce leukemia, but seeing that most have been won, and even the EPA recommends "prudent avoidance", we're safe to believe that long term exposure to EMF fields is a health risk. Mentioning the EPA just reminded me of the Simpsons movie ;)
On a more serious side:
@mark.assad: After looking at the datasheets of the EMF meters offered by Katranji, and after getting a price quote, I recommend the Lutron EMF822A meter (cost: 100$ including VAT) for the following reasons:
1) Good bandwidth (30 to 300 Hz) + follows ISO standards => can be used to measure EMF fields of different home appliances, industrial devices, and power lines => good investment for both hobbyist and professional use
2) The ELV E/H field meter is more expensive (cost: 200$ including VAT) while being of same accuracy (the only additive features is indicating whether the source of EMF interference is low or high and the hold function to save the display readings => not worth the additional cost for a hobbyist).
3) The LUTRON EMF824 cannot operate without a multimeter seeing that it is an add-on device => you have to have a good, reliable true RMS multimeter to work with it. It has the exact same bandwidth testing range and measuring range. It's cost is not worth getting to be honest (about 70$ including VAT).
4) The LUTRON EMF828 is a 3D EMF meter but otherwise identical to the LUTRON EMF822A => not worth the cost (didn't even ask about it).