Great pings

bigjudge

Hey geeks, this is really weird, for the first time in over 2 years i get these pings. My ISP is Terranet. Location is Tripoli, Time is 10 PM.

Pinging eu-fp.wa1.b.yahoo.com [87.248.122.122] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 87.248.122.122: bytes=32 time=124ms TTL=51
Reply from 87.248.122.122: bytes=32 time=128ms TTL=51
Reply from 87.248.122.122: bytes=32 time=127ms TTL=51
Reply from 87.248.122.122: bytes=32 time=125ms TTL=51

Pinging www.bbc.net.uk [212.58.246.91] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 212.58.246.91: bytes=32 time=113ms TTL=52
Reply from 212.58.246.91: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=52
Reply from 212.58.246.91: bytes=32 time=114ms TTL=52
Reply from 212.58.246.91: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=52

Pinging a1574.g.akamai.net [80.239.201.120] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 80.239.201.120: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=55
Reply from 80.239.201.120: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=55
Reply from 80.239.201.120: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=55
Reply from 80.239.201.120: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=55

Pinging www.l.google.com [209.85.229.104] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 209.85.229.104: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.229.104: bytes=32 time=115ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.229.104: bytes=32 time=116ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.229.104: bytes=32 time=115ms TTL=51

azife

i wish its the IMWE cable and the cable will land in tripoli

Aj_BlaZ

Its 12:30 AM ;) , using Secret sodetel connection :p

C:\Users\*****>ping eu-fp.wa1.b.yahoo.com

Pinging eu-fp.wa1.b.yahoo.com [87.248.122.122] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 87.248.122.122: bytes=32 time=113ms TTL=51
Reply from 87.248.122.122: bytes=32 time=113ms TTL=51
Reply from 87.248.122.122: bytes=32 time=121ms TTL=51
Reply from 87.248.122.122: bytes=32 time=122ms TTL=51

Ping statistics for 87.248.122.122:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 113ms, Maximum = 122ms, Average = 117ms

C:\Users\*****>ping www.bbc.net.uk

Pinging www.bbc.net.uk [212.58.246.94] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=52
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=104ms TTL=52
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=96ms TTL=52
Reply from 212.58.246.94: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=52

Ping statistics for 212.58.246.94:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 96ms, Maximum = 112ms, Average = 105ms

C:\Users\*****>ping a1574.g.akamai.net

Pinging a1574.g.akamai.net [62.41.10.32] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 62.41.10.32: bytes=32 time=102ms TTL=53
Reply from 62.41.10.32: bytes=32 time=103ms TTL=53
Reply from 62.41.10.32: bytes=32 time=116ms TTL=53
Reply from 62.41.10.32: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=53

Ping statistics for 62.41.10.32:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 102ms, Maximum = 116ms, Average = 107ms

C:\Users\*****>ping www.l.google.com

Pinging www.l.google.com [66.249.92.104] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 66.249.92.104: bytes=32 time=115ms TTL=52
Reply from 66.249.92.104: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=52
Reply from 66.249.92.104: bytes=32 time=114ms TTL=52
Reply from 66.249.92.104: bytes=32 time=114ms TTL=52

Ping statistics for 66.249.92.104:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 112ms, Maximum = 115ms, Average = 113ms

Aj_BlaZ

actually its the results from 4-5 months ago , just a reminder the ping will never get better after the upgrading stage of ogero ! , why ??? , cause what they trying to do is to increase the bandwidth that's all but surely it will get better inside of lebanon because of the fiber optics .

amkahal

a decrease in latency inside Lebanon means a decrease in whole global latency.
ex:
if the latency between my machine and terranet is 40 ms and the latency to bbc.co.uk is 140 that's mean the latency from terranet to bbc.co.uk is 100 ms, so the whole latency after improvements should decrease.
100+40 ==> 100+20 (maybe less).
by the way i am with Terranet and nothing is improved.

Aj_BlaZ

amkahal wrotea decrease in latency inside Lebanon means a decrease in whole global latency.
ex:
if the latency between my machine and terranet is 40 ms and the latency to bbc.co.uk is 140 that's mean the latency from terranet to bbc.co.uk is 100 ms, so the whole latency after improvements should decrease.
100+40 ==> 100+20 (maybe less).
by the way i am with Terranet and nothing is improved.

please reread kindly my post what you have said is the same -_-!

but surely it will get better inside of lebanon because of the fiber optics .

kareem_nasser

gamer4life is in tripoli and was having such latency results for months now.

bigjudge

kareem_nasser wrotegamer4life is in tripoli and was having such latency results for months now.

I haven't pinged anything for months now. I hope this latency gets even better.

MegaCool

ok thats it i'll move to Tripoli if thats the case

Ghaleb

MegaCool wroteok thats it i'll move to Tripoli if thats the case

I am in Tripoli, I have an IDM 512K connection with Unlimited Night Traffic and I am still having a bad latency !

amkahal

so Myth Busted ;)

vengeance666

wow ill move to tripoli by tomorrow morning !! it's 3:10 AM now , just did the test and well...got an F* line quality , a 857 average ms and well 500 something jitter , for god sakes it's 3:10 AM , not peak time !!
any miracles might happen soon in other regions ? ^O)

Aj_BlaZ

im not from tripoli ;) , from beirut mareliess ....

\/\/-!-_-!-\/\/

amkahal

any Terranet user can ping ssg.terra.net.lb for me ??

Joudi416

http://www.pingtest.net/result/23447836.png

after getting an F many times i finally got a D
waw wondering what the dial up connection deserved :S probably a Z

amkahal

@Joudi416:
For best results, ping something in UK, such as Manchester, Maidenhead... since Lebanon route starts in London.

bigjudge

amkahal wroteany Terranet user can ping ssg.terra.net.lb for me ??

Here you go

Pinging ssg.terra.net.lb [212.98.136.18] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 212.98.136.18: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=253
Reply from 212.98.136.18: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=253
Reply from 212.98.136.18: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=253
Reply from 212.98.136.18: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=253
Reply from 212.98.136.18: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=253
Reply from 212.98.136.18: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=253
Reply from 212.98.136.18: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=253

amkahal

Thx a lot bigjudge, you have a good latency to Terranet Gateway, mine is 40~50 ms :(
maybe the Ogero infrastructure in Bekaa is Poor.

MegaCool

im not a terranet user, here is the ping to the site

Pinging ssg.terra.net.lb [212.98.136.18] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 212.98.136.18: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=247
Reply from 212.98.136.18: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=247
Reply from 212.98.136.18: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=247
Reply from 212.98.136.18: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=247
Reply from 212.98.136.18: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=247
Reply from 212.98.136.18: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=247
Reply from 212.98.136.18: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=247
Reply from 212.98.136.18: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=247
Reply from 212.98.136.18: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=247
Reply from 212.98.136.18: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=247
Reply from 212.98.136.18: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=247

hussam

vengeance666 wrotejust did the test and well...got an F* line quality , a 857 average ms and well 500 something jitter , for god sakes it's 3:10 AM , not peak time !!

VISP? ^^