samer wrotevegetaleb wroteBB internet is as slow as wap...in Lebanon of course
Don't misinform people. The BIS is running on EDGE and is definitely faster than WAP.
it's theoretically faster but not practically. Most of the time both are overloaded making the difference barely noticeable. GPRS and WAP are both powered by the same ISP and sharing the same bandwidth but with different quota and policies.
EDGE can enable data transfer rates of up to 1024 kilobits/sec vs 0 to 170kbps for GPRS
But the reality is that operators will not allow you to attain that speed. Max speed I got using GPRS was 68kbps at 4:00 AM vs 79kbps at the same time, same operator. During day time, the average speed is somewhere between 20-30kbps ( peak attainable transfer rate is another story, it's just that you rarely reach it) I have a bandwidth meter on my PDA and the edge speed is really pathetic, not to mention the latency.
Mobile internet in Lebanon is power by poor bandwidth provided by ISPs like Terranet etc.. that already have pathetic latency and stabiliy.
EDGE in Lebanon was implemented by Motorola providing a platform that uses packet compression technology providing enhanced data rate transfer over GPRS theoretically activated by a software and some tranceiver units installed on the BS. No changes were made to the core network
We are still using a 8-PSK modulation therefore the maximum speed is somewhere around 60kbps...
You only get higher speeds when the modulation is shifted to QAM ( 16 or 32 ) which is not the case in Lebanon. Using QAM you can get up to 800kbps download speed with reduced latency almost to half.
Now back to the topic, I'm a fan of HTC smartphones but Nokia is catching up lately with some great new products. However, I won't drop my HD2 until I find a good alternative.