260 will kick 250 GTS anytime. And real comparisons will be better suited for future games.
If you've got the budget and your PC can handle it, get the best card!
If you've got the budget and your PC can handle it, get the best card!
I wouldn't call a 5-6 FPS difference as close. It can be the difference between playable and unplayable. in this case however they'r both unplayable,during combat that is. GTX275 is clearly betterGN90 wroteSo True !! i ask my freinds what VGA you have to see if a game would work on their system and they tell me : "it is so powerful 1GB" :Psin wroteWatch out however from the marketing campaigns, especially in Lebanon, that give high importance to video memory. Excessive VGA memory does not improve gaming performance. You may gain a couple of FPSes on very high resolutions (which is not a need in your case since your screen is not huge).
I recommend you get the 1 GB version. You'll be paying extra for the 2 GB without using a single byte of them in any game.
Hope this helped.
and with vista your ram are shared with the Vram
your resolution is basic , I have a weaker VGA and i play with greater res, but you need to upgrade your 300W Power Supply for sure.Tako_400 wroteThe resolution is the standard screen resolution, 1366 x 768. I might play shooters. But most of all I'll be playing strategy games and RPGs. And I've got 300W of power.
the ATI HD4890 1GB uses 222W when idle and 317 with Crysis DX10 enabled . The GTX275 has lower power consumption when idle (187W) but greater power when fully used with Crysis (364W) (numbers taken form Bit-tech.net)
Testing both cards with Crysis on max, DirectX10, 16XAF, 4XAA, 1680*1050 these are the results: GTX275 36.9FPS average (22 Lowest) ATI Radeon HD4890 1GB 31FPS (17 Lowest) So performance very close !!!
Idk witch Version of the GTX275/HD4980 you will get but those where the basic versions of both cards, any other version will have a slightly better performance