Stygmata Adata is faster but its life expectancy is 50% lower than the crucial ( mbtf 1 million hours vs 1.5 million )
Die_Kapitan Stygmata wroteAdata is faster but its life expectancy is 50% lower than the crucial ( mbtf 1 million hours vs 1.5 million ) Actually, the MX100 is nearly 18% faster than the SX900 and 41% faster than the SP900 AND is cheaper.
Stygmata Die_Kapitan wroteStygmata wroteAdata is faster but its life expectancy is 50% lower than the crucial ( mbtf 1 million hours vs 1.5 million ) Actually, the MX100 is nearly 18% faster than the SX900 and 41% faster than the SP900 AND is cheaper. You are mistaken...check this : http://ssd.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Crucial-MX100-128GB-vs-Adata-Premier-Pro-SP900-128GB/2618vs1930
Johnaudi Stygmata wroteAdata is faster but its life expectancy is 50% lower than the crucial ( mbtf 1 million hours vs 1.5 million ) 1 million hours is 100+ years if your PC is always on, I doubt anyone would still use SSD in a hundred years?
Die_Kapitan Stygmata wroteDie_Kapitan wroteStygmata wroteAdata is faster but its life expectancy is 50% lower than the crucial ( mbtf 1 million hours vs 1.5 million ) Actually, the MX100 is nearly 18% faster than the SX900 and 41% faster than the SP900 AND is cheaper. You are mistaken...check this : http://ssd.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Crucial-MX100-128GB-vs-Adata-Premier-Pro-SP900-128GB/2618vs1930 It says the MX100 is 216th in Speed Rank while the SP900 is 369th.
ahmad-toutounji crucial mx100 512gb one is faster than the 128gb and 265gb i seen it as 38 ranking or something like that in the speed rank .