thephoenician wrote
Yes of course many people excluding the aforementioned 90% of subscribers who are systematically denied their right to benefit from the new plans like the rest who are on higher plans without having to pay more (why not double the quota for the entry plan, or at least add 20 GB more?!).
Yeah, why not 30GB? or why not triple?
Math and impact on whole sector and state budget so complex, that such changes require a lot of work for each new number. I thought to write most of factors, but i guess i wrote them before, and it will take too much time, and noone will read all text anyway.
And about quota. Yes, warning should exist, customers should be able to subscribe to such warnings and receive them comfortable way, and to see their current quota level.
But no, it is not Ogero or any ISP duty to teach users how to manage their consumption. This is not social project, this is business, and we are not in school or kindergarden, if user want - he ask tech-savvy guys, and they point to tricks. And there is lot of beautiful ways to manage quota from customer side.
If customer are not comfortable with extra consumption, but also dont want to use nature given gift in their head called "brain" - i'm sorry, then time to pay for lazyness.
This is same as to require restaurants to tell "hey dude, this new expensive tea you ordered will cost $100 more(and last one you used to water plants nearby) , your total bill is $12340, are you sure its good choice?". Did you ever seen that? No. People who come to restaurant watch prices and decide, and restaurants do not interfere in their choice.
Restaurants often offer "open buffet" as well, but usually it doesnt include "fancy" dishes and so, just common stuff that is enough to enjoy time and to have fixed bill at the end, similar to Ogero unlimited.
If restaurant visitor can't do simple math and manage his consumption with available finances - it's called mental disability.
